@inbook {102247,
	title = {Science teacher education and professional development in argumentation},
	booktitle = {Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research},
	volume = {35},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {245-268},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	abstract = {<p style="text-align: justify;">What do teachers (pre-service teachers as well as in-service teachers) need to know in order to be able to implement argumentation processes proficiently in their classrooms? What implications does that body of knowledge have for teacher education (TE) and professional development (PD) programs? Let us take a look at the reflections of a teacher who had taught (what she considered to be) a successful argumentation lesson in a ninth grade biology class. The teacher provided guidance to a group of four students who engaged in an argumentation activity about moral dilemmas in human genetics (Zohar \&amp; Nemet, 2000). A typical problem with students{\textquoteright} initial reasoning in this unit is that they tend to form unwarranted opinions, ignoring alternative points of view. When they do justify their opinions, they tend to avoid cardinal justifications that involve the ethical sides of the issue, and thus to circumvent the focus of the dilemma. In her analysis of part of a lesson in which she provided guidance to her students, the teacher reported that before her intervention, students expressed their opinions in a loud voice, did not justify their opinions and did not listen to each other. A dramatic change took place following her intervention: students started to phrase the dilemma in terms of principled bio-ethical considerations, justify their opinions, refute each other{\textquoteright}s arguments, and explain why other people{\textquoteright}s opinions may be wrong. The guidance that has been successful in bringing about such a high-level discussion may seem an easy thing to do. Therefore, we should pay attention to the teacher{\textquoteright}s report of what she had felt during the process of guiding her students (Zohar, 2004a, p. 146)</p>},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_12},
	author = {Zohar A.,}
}
